RSS FCC Headlines
Published on:

By and

Pillsbury’s communications lawyers have published the FCC Enforcement Monitor monthly since 1999 to inform our clients of notable FCC enforcement actions against FCC license holders and others.  This month’s issue is a special edition:

FCC Enforcement Monitor—The Government Shutdown Edition

While shutdowns of the federal government have become depressingly common, the FCC has generally been less affected than most government agencies because it is not funded by taxpayer dollars but by regulatory fees paid by broadcasters and others regulated by the FCC.  However, because the FCC collects those fees in arrears—at the end of the fiscal year they fund rather than the beginning—the FCC must borrow operating funds from the federal government to operate and then repay that debt when regulatory fees are collected at the end of the fiscal year.  That is the reason the FCC is never able to extend its regulatory fee collection deadline beyond September 30, the last day of the federal fiscal year.

Because of timing differences and the fact that the FCC collects more in fees in a typical year than its actual operating costs, it has often been able to continue operating during a government shutdown, sometimes throughout the entire shutdown if its funds are ample and the shutdown short.  It was therefore a bit surprising when the FCC deviated from that practice during this government shutdown and not only shut down immediately, but took offline many of its online systems that had remained available in prior government shutdowns.

While many FCC licensees can operate for quite a while without needing to file an electronic application or report with the Commission, they far more frequently must rely on the public-facing informational websites of the FCC that were shut down this time.  As a result, the shutdown has deprived broadcasters and others of even routine historical or technical information needed to prepare reports and continue operations, even if those reports can’t be filed until the government reopens.

This has led to what has been one of the more abrupt, disruptive, and longest FCC shutdowns in history.  A side effect of that, which some might consider a silver lining, is that there have been few FCC enforcement actions in the past month on which to report.  So instead of the normal description of recent enforcement actions, we are going to use this edition to report on shutdown-related information that will potentially affect future regulatory obligations and enforcement actions.  In particular, broadcasters and other licensees should remember that most regulatory obligations continue in effect despite the shutdown and temporary unavailability of key FCC websites.  As a result, unlike the base jumpers now parachuting from El Capitan with no park rangers in sight, FCC licensees must toe the line, even in the many instances where the FCC shutdown has made rule compliance even more difficult.

 Political File Obligations Continue Even Though the Online Public Inspection File Is Down

The FCC’s Online Public Inspection File (OPIF) system was one of the many FCC websites taken offline during this shutdown.  Since the Political File is part of the OPIF database, it is also offline.  However, the rules requiring stations to keep their Political File up to date remain in effect.  Broadcast stations, as well as cable, DBS, and SDARS operators, must continue to document all requests for the purchase of ad time by legally qualified candidates and issue advertisers.  Since that can’t be done in the FCC’s Political File database, it must now either be done online (for example, on a station’s website) or, for broadcasters, in paper or electronic form at an “accessible location” in the station’s community of license during normal business hours. Continue reading →

Published on:

By and

At today’s Open Meeting, the FCC unanimously adopted a Fifth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to accelerate the transition to the ATSC 3.0 broadcast standard (NextGen TV).  The NPRM sets the stage for significant progress towards a nationwide transition, proposing to shift from mandatory to voluntary ATSC 1.0 simulcasting because broadcasters are now “best positioned to determine how to continue to serve their viewers while rolling out 3.0 services.”

Under current rules adopted in the FCC’s 2017 First NextGen TV Report and Order, full-power and Class A stations seeking to transition to the ATSC 3.0 standard must maintain an ATSC 1.0 simulcast of their primary stream through a partnership with one or more ATSC 1.0 “host” stations assigned to the same designated market area, and the ATSC 1.0 simulcast stream must be “substantially similar” to the ATSC 3.0 stream.  The simulcasting requirement was intended to be transitional, and the Commission initially scheduled the “substantially similar” requirement to sunset on July 17, 2023.  As that date approached, however, the FCC adopted the June 2023 Third Report and Order and Fourth Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking extending the sunset date to July 17, 2027.

Since then, the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) and many individual broadcasters have continued to press the FCC for greater simulcasting flexibility in order to more effectively showcase the benefits of the ATSC 3.0 standard, including in comments submitted in the Delete, Delete, Delete proceeding.  NAB also filed a Petition for Rulemaking (NAB Petition) earlier this year asking the FCC to, among other things:

  • Establish a two-phase mandatory transition under which stations in the top 55 markets would move fully to ATSC 3.0 by February 2028 and all remaining markets by February 2030, with limited exceptions for noncommercial educational or smaller, independent stations;
  • Eliminate the “substantially similar” requirement prior to the scheduled 2027 sunset date;
  • Relax the 95 percent coverage threshold required for expedited application processing;
  • Update the tuner and carriage standards to ensure that consumers can continue to receive broadcast programming as the industry transitions to ATSC 3.0; and
  • Consider updates to the MVPD carriage rules, including the “good quality signal” rule.

The Media Bureau received more than 900 comments and replies in response to the NAB Petition in a pleading cycle that closed in June 2025. Continue reading →

Published on:

By and

Broadcasters’ next Quarterly Issues/Programs List (“Quarterly List”) must be placed in stations’ Public Inspection Files by October 10, 2025, reflecting information for the months of July, August, and September 2025.

Content of the Quarterly List

The FCC requires each broadcast station to air a reasonable amount of programming responsive to significant community needs, issues, and problems as determined by the station.  The FCC gives each station the discretion to determine which issues facing the community served by the station are the most significant and how best to respond to them in the station’s overall programming.

To demonstrate a station’s compliance with this public interest obligation, the FCC requires the station to maintain and place in the Public Inspection File a Quarterly List reflecting the “station’s most significant programming treatment of community issues during the preceding three month period.”  By its use of the term “most significant,” the FCC has noted that stations are not required to list all responsive programming, but only that programming which provided the most significant treatment of the issues identified.

Given that program logs are no longer mandated by the FCC, the Quarterly Lists may be the most important evidence of a station’s compliance with its public service obligations.  The lists also provide important support for the certification of Class A television station compliance discussed below.  We therefore urge stations not to “skimp” on the Quarterly Lists, and to err on the side of over-inclusiveness.  Otherwise, stations risk a determination by the FCC that they did not adequately serve the public interest during their license term.  Stations should include in the Quarterly Lists as much issue-responsive programming as they feel is necessary to demonstrate fully their responsiveness to community needs.  Taking extra time now to provide a thorough Quarterly List will help reduce risk at license renewal time.

The FCC has repeatedly emphasized the importance of the Quarterly Lists and often brings enforcement actions against stations that do not have complete Quarterly Lists in their Public Inspection File or which have failed to timely upload such lists when due.  The FCC’s base fine for missing or late Quarterly Lists is $10,000.

Preparation of the Quarterly List

The Quarterly Lists are required to be placed in the Public Inspection File by January 10, April 10, July 10, and October 10 of each year.  The next Quarterly List is required to be placed in stations’ Public Inspection Files by October 10, 2025, covering the period from July 1, 2025 through September 30, 2025. Continue reading →

Published on:

By and

Pillsbury’s communications lawyers have published the FCC Enforcement Monitor monthly since 1999 to inform our clients of notable FCC enforcement actions against FCC license holders and others.  This month’s issue includes:

  • $7,000 Consent Decree for National Cell Phone Provider Marketing Unauthorized Smartphone
  • FCC Pursues Missouri Property Owners Over Pirate Radio Broadcasts
  • New Hampshire AM Station Gets Notice of Violation for Failing to Air Station IDs

FCC Settles Investigation Into Marketing of Unauthorized Smartphone

A national wireless provider entered into a Consent Decree with the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau for marketing a smartphone in the United States prior to receiving equipment authorization for it from the Commission.  The phone was announced and marketing of it commenced on May 14, 2024.  The provider advertised and otherwise marketed the phone for over a week until it was made available for purchase on May 23, 2024.  The phone received an FCC equipment authorization on May 29, 2024.  During that two-week period, thousands of phones were sold to consumers in violation of the FCC’s equipment marketing rules.

Section 302(b) of the Communications Act and Section 2.803(b) of the FCC’s Rules prohibit marketing or importing radio frequency devices prior to receiving equipment authorization by the FCC.  “Marketing” includes selling, leasing, offering for sale or lease, advertising for sale or lease, importing, shipping, or distributing the device for sale or lease.  Sections 2.1203 and 2.1204 of the FCC’s Rules require radio frequency devices to receive equipment authorization approval prior to importation into the U.S. unless the device qualifies for an exemption and complies with the FCC’s applicable technical and administrative requirements.

In October 2024, the FCC sent a Letter of Inquiry (LOI) to the provider requesting information about the marketing of the smartphone and seeking information regarding compliance with the FCC’s import restrictions.  The provider timely responded to the LOI, explaining that it typically “relies on manufacturers to ensure that FCC equipment authorization procedures are met” and citing its contractual terms with the manufacturer regarding authorization prior to delivery.  The FCC determined, however, that those contractual references were insufficient to avoid a violation of its import rules.

To resolve the matter, the provider entered into a Consent Decree with the Enforcement Bureau under which it agreed to implement a Compliance Plan and make a $7,000 voluntary contribution to the U.S. Treasury.  The Consent Decree requires the provider to designate a compliance officer, implement a multi-part Compliance Plan, file annual compliance reports with the Commission for the next three years, and verify that all devices have proper FCC authorization (or qualify for an exemption) prior to accepting delivery of them.

Missouri Property Owners Warned Over Illegal Radio Broadcasts

The Enforcement Bureau issued a Notice of Illegal Pirate Radio Broadcasting (Notice) to two property owners in Boonville, Missouri.  The Enforcement Bureau’s Columbia Office investigated the property after receiving a complaint about unlicensed operation.  The agents confirmed, using direction-finding techniques, that unauthorized transmissions were emanating from the property on two separate occasions: December 18, 2024, and August 21, 2025.

FCC records indicated that no license had been issued for a broadcast station at that location, and the Enforcement Bureau determined that exemptions for extremely low-powered devices also did not apply. Continue reading →

Published on:

By and

On August 29, 2025, the FCC released its Report and Order establishing the annual regulatory fees for Fiscal Year (FY) 2025.  The Commission followed that release with a Public Notice announcing that regulatory fees must be paid no later than 11:59 PM, Eastern Daylight Time on September 25, 2025. The fees must be paid for all licenses and initial construction permits granted on or before October 1, 2024.

As in recent years, the FCC requires all regulatees to pay fees electronically through its CORES system, which can be found here.  Payments may be made by credit card, debit card, ACH transfer, or wire transfer.  The Commission will not accept payments made by check, money order, or cashier’s check.

For FY 2025, the FCC will collect a total of $390,192,000 in regulatory fees, the same amount it collected in 2024 and 2023.  For the third year in a row, however, radio broadcast licensees will see a year over year reduction in their fees, averaging between 2.5-3% across station classes and population tiers.  Television station fees are set individually based on the station’s population coverage.  This year, the FCC is charging $0.006674 per pop, which marks a slight increase following two consecutive years of reductions.  To determine the precise regulatory fees owed, broadcasters should consult Appendices B (Radio) and F (Television) at the end of the Report and Order.

The FCC is once again encouraging early payment, particularly for those using wire transfers or ACH payments, to ensure processing delays do not cause a late payment.  Late payments trigger a mandatory 25% penalty, along with interest charges on any unpaid fees.  The FCC will credit partial payments, but any unpaid balances are still subject to the 25% penalty and interest.  Failure to pay all regulatory fees can also result in dismissal of pending applications, a stop on all future application processing, and potentially license revocation.

Licensees seeking relief from regulatory fee obligations may request a waiver, reduction, deferral, or installment payment plan by the payment deadline.  The filing procedures are outlined in a separate Public Notice titled Procedures for Filing Requests for Waiver, Reduction, Deferral and Installment Payment of Fiscal Year 2025 Regulatory Fees.  Requests citing financial hardship must include supporting documentation sufficient to demonstrate that payment of the fees would impose a financial hardship on the regulatee.  As late or unsupported requests are generally denied, filers should make sure to read the Public Notice carefully before submitting their request.

Published on:

By and

October 1 is the deadline for broadcast stations licensed to communities in Alaska, American Samoa, Florida, Guam, Hawaii, Iowa, the Mariana Islands, Missouri, Oregon, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and Washington to place their Annual EEO Public File Report in their Public Inspection File and post the report on their station website.

Under the FCC’s EEO Rule, all radio and television station employment units (“SEUs”), regardless of staff size, must afford equal opportunity to all qualified persons and practice nondiscrimination in employment.

In addition, those SEUs with five or more full-time employees (“Nonexempt SEUs”) must also comply with the FCC’s three-prong outreach requirements.  Specifically, Nonexempt SEUs must (i) broadly and inclusively disseminate information about every full-time job opening, except in exigent circumstances, (ii) send notifications of full-time job vacancies to referral organizations that have requested such notification, and (iii) earn a certain minimum number of EEO credits based on participation in various non-vacancy-specific outreach initiatives (“Menu Options”) suggested by the FCC, during each of the two-year segments (four segments total) that comprise a station’s eight-year license term.  These Menu Option initiatives include, for example, sponsoring job fairs, participating in job fairs, and having an internship program.

Nonexempt SEUs must prepare and place their Annual EEO Public File Report in the Public Inspection Files and on the websites of all stations comprising the SEU (if they have a website) by the anniversary date of the filing deadline for that station’s license renewal application.  The Annual EEO Public File Report summarizes the SEU’s EEO activities during the previous 12 months, and the licensee must maintain adequate records to document those activities.

For a detailed description of the EEO Rule and practical assistance in preparing a compliance plan, broadcasters should consult The FCC’s Equal Employment Opportunity Rules and Policies – A Guide for Broadcasters published by Pillsbury’s Communications Practice Group.

Deadline for the Annual EEO Public File Report for Nonexempt Radio and Television SEUs

Consistent with the above, October 1, 2025 is the date by which Nonexempt SEUs of radio and television stations licensed to communities in the states identified above, including Class A television stations, must (i) place their Annual EEO Public File Report in the Public Inspection Files of all stations comprising the SEU, and (ii) post the Report on the websites, if any, of those stations.  Once the new Report is posted on a station’s website, the prior year’s Report may be removed from that website. Continue reading →

Published on:

By
  • The Trump administration’s new Executive Order formally adopts a policy to “enhance American greatness in space.”
  • The EO directs streamlining and reform efforts in four key areas—commercial launch and reentry, spaceport infrastructure, novel space activities, and regulatory leadership and accountability.
  • While the EO was well received by the commercial space industry, the ability of the Administration to execute on the EO’s ambitious scope may be impacted by recent budgetary and workforce changes to key agencies and early concerns by some environmental groups and associations that expediting or eliminating review processes may harm ecosystems and communities around spaceports.

The first Trump administration galvanized significant and sustainable transformation of the U.S. space industry, including the reconstitution of the National Space Council, the creation of the U.S. Space Force, the formation of the Artemis Accords, and substantial regulatory reform aimed at the licensing of launch vehicles, Earth observation satellites, and next-generation broadband constellations, among others. On August 13, 2025, the second Trump administration released an ambitious Executive Order (EO), Enabling Competition in the Commercial Space Industry, to further build on the off-worldly successes of President Trump’s first term.

Recognizing that the ability of U.S. operators to “efficiently launch, conduct missions … and reenter United States airspace” is critical to the U.S. economy, its national security, and the success of the U.S. Government in accomplishing its own space objectives, the EO formally adopts a policy to “enhance American greatness in space.” To achieve this objective, the EO directs streamlining and reform efforts in four key areas—commercial launch and reentry, spaceport infrastructure, novel space activities, and regulatory leadership and accountability—to foster competition among launch providers and facilitate a substantial increase in launch cadence and the deployment of novel space activities by the target date of 2030. Continue reading →

Published on:

By

Pillsbury’s communications lawyers have published the FCC Enforcement Monitor monthly since 1999 to inform our clients of notable FCC enforcement actions against FCC license holders and others.  This month’s issue includes:

  • Low Power FM Licensee Cedes De Facto Station Control Through Contract
  • Pirate Radio Station Operator Arrested During Live Broadcast
  • Northeast Property Owners Warned Over Illegal Radio Broadcasts

Short-Term License Renewal and $2,000 Consent Decree for LPFM Control Violation

The FCC’s Media Bureau entered into a Consent Decree with the licensee of a North Carolina low power FM (LPFM) station to resolve an investigation into whether the licensee violated Section 310(d) of the Communications Act and Section 73.865 of the FCC’s Rules.  Under those provisions, an LPFM station cannot be transferred or assigned to another party without the FCC’s prior consent.

To determine whether control of a broadcast station has transferred, the FCC considers “actual or legal control, direct or indirect control, negative or affirmative control, and de facto as well as de jure control.”  An analysis of de facto control looks at the exercise of control over a station’s programming, personnel, and finances, among other things.  Surrendering control over these matters to another person transfers de facto control of the station.

Following receipt of a complaint alleging the station’s former licensee was controlling the station pursuant to a local marketing agreement, the FCC conducted an investigation.  It concluded that the current licensee had ceded control of the station to the former licensee by entering into an agreement that gave the former licensee “sole right and privilege to determine the selection of programs” and required the station to “broadcast the provided programming, in its entirety, as delivered by [the former licensee] without any editing, 24 hours per day, 7 days per week.”  Broadcast licensees are not allowed to convey such unfettered control over a station’s programming to another party. Continue reading →

Published on:

By and

Following the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision affirming the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) authority to administer the Universal Service Fund (USF or Fund), a bipartisan, bicameral group of members of Congress are taking tangible steps towards potential USF reform.  In an effort to evaluate and propose potential reforms to the USF with the goal of developing a forum to guide education, awareness, and policymaking, the Congressional USF working group is currently seeking public input on how best to re-shape the Fund going forward to ensure the long-term effectiveness of each USF program.

Earlier this month, Senator Deb Fischer (R-NE) announced the launch of the USF working group’s public comment portal.  Interested parties, whether individuals or organizations, have an opportunity to provide initial responses to help guide Congress as it reviews the structure, priorities, and implementation strategy of the Fund.  The questionnaire directs respondents to share their input on specific topics concerning the effectiveness of existing programs and considerations for reform, including: Continue reading →

Published on:

By and

On Thursday, August 7, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC” or “Commission”) held its monthly Open Meeting, where it considered items spanning several industries, including broadcasting, satellite communications, and public safety, among others.  The expansive agenda reflected the Commission’s full court press on agency-wide regulatory streamlining, system modernization, and expansion of nationwide connectivity initiatives.  Below are high-level summaries of the items the Commission considered and adopted as part of the August meeting:

NEPA Review Modernization

The Commission adopted a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to re-examine its environmental review procedures in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) as amended in 2023, and to ensure such procedures are clear, facilitate greater and faster infrastructure deployment, and accelerate the federal permitting process.  To advance these objectives, the NPRM seeks comment on whether and how to revise the FCC’s rules to align with the updated definition of a “major federal action,” update or replace the Commission’s longstanding categorical exclusions, and streamline review timelines for environmental assessments and impact statements.  The NPRM further inquires whether geographic-area licenses and other Commission actions should trigger NEPA obligations and seeks comment on  proposed changes to related rules under the National Historic Preservation Act.

  • Comments on the NPRM are due by September 18, 2025; Reply Comments are due by October 3, 2025.

Streamlining Space Bureau Reviews

The Commission adopted a Second Report and Order (Order) in its Expediting Initial Processing of Satellite and Earth Station Applications proceeding, which focuses on further expediting processing of applications and removing certain regulatory barriers to modifying systems following authorization.  The Order facilitates the expansion of ground station as a service (GSaaS) by allowing operators to apply for baseline earth station licenses without pre-identified satellite points of communication and by streamlining the process by which operators can add or remove satellite points of communication to an existing earth station authorization.  Significantly, the Order also expands the types of modifications that will not require prior FCC approval, giving more post-authorization flexibility to space and earth station operators.  The Order also eliminates the paper copy retention rule, aligns renewal timelines across earth stations, geostationary, and non-geostationary satellite applications, adds a 30-day shot clock for certain renewals, and permits market access grantees to request special temporary access.

  • Except for those rules subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act, the Order will become effective on September 26, 2025.

Continue reading →