Published on:

By and

 To close out 2025, the Space Bureau has conducted one last check of its open docket list, adding a final name to its packed post-President’s Day comment window.  An end of year Public Notice asks commenters to refresh the record on a five-year old rulemaking that proposes permitting non-geostationary orbit (NGSO) satellite systems to communicate with fixed earth stations mounted on moving platforms—known as Earth Stations in Motion (ESIMs)—in additional frequency bands, including the 28.35–28.6 GHz band.  The proceeding, which followed in earnest on successive proceedings to expand ESIM availability across the Fixed-satellite service beginning in geostationary satellite orbit (GSO) and then in NGSO, has stagnated in recent years.

In 2020, the FCC tentatively authorized NGSO ESIMs in the 28.4-28.6 GHz band while deferring action on the 28.35-28.4 GHz portion of the band pending further study of out-of-band emissions vis-à-vis Upper Microwave Flexible Use Services (UMFUS) in the adjacent 27.5-28.35 GHz band.  Similar to other proceedings in the millimeterwave bands, the Bureau is requesting commenters update the record to provide any new or updated information or studies on the proposed emission limits, as well as the UMFUS and ESIM technologies deployed in their respective bands and any anticipated uses of these services.

Comments are due January 21, 2026; reply comments are due February 5, 2026.  Interested parties are advised that this proceeding is intended to run in parallel with—and does not duplicate the efforts of—the on-going Space Modernization or Facilitating More Intensive Use of Upper Microwave Flexible Use Spectrum rulemakings.  Any rules adopted in this proceeding shall be incorporated into the applicable rule section—Part 25 or Part 100—as and if applicable.

For more information about the above Public Notice, submitting comments, or NGSO satellite systems and ESIMs generally, please contact a member of Pillsbury’s Communications Practice Group.

Published on:

By and

The rapid expansion of the commercial space economy over the last decade has resulted in demand on spectrum far exceeding the Commission’s expectations at the time it devised and adopted its Upper Microwave Flexible Use Spectrum (UMFUS) sharing framework. At the same time, negligible adoption of millimeter wave bands by terrestrial services has upended the assumptions central to the framework and its constraints on earth station deployments in favor of 5G operations. As a result, the UMFUS framework quickly became an impediment to efficient use of millimeter wave spectrum and a barrier to the deployment of next-generation satellite systems.

Continue reading →

Published on:

By and
  • The FCC unanimously adopted an NPRM proposing a comprehensive restructuring and reform of its long-standing space and earth station licensing rules (Part 25).
  • The NPRM proposes to wholly replace its “Part 25 – Satellite Communications” rules with a new “Part 100 – Space and Earth Station Services” rule section.
  • Comments are due on January 20, 2026, with reply comments due by February 18, 2026.

In an effort to more effectively keep pace with and reduce the burdens on the rapidly evolving and expanding commercial space sector, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) unanimously adopted a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) proposing a comprehensive restructuring and reform of its long-standing space and earth station licensing rules (Part 25). With its breadth of scope and potential impacts across the space ecosystem, the NPRM also serves to highlight the key role the Commission will play in advancing the Trump administration’s broader objective to enhance American greatness in space and facilitate U.S. leadership and innovation.

Continue reading →

Published on:

By
  • The Trump administration’s new Executive Order formally adopts a policy to “enhance American greatness in space.”
  • The EO directs streamlining and reform efforts in four key areas—commercial launch and reentry, spaceport infrastructure, novel space activities, and regulatory leadership and accountability.
  • While the EO was well received by the commercial space industry, the ability of the Administration to execute on the EO’s ambitious scope may be impacted by recent budgetary and workforce changes to key agencies and early concerns by some environmental groups and associations that expediting or eliminating review processes may harm ecosystems and communities around spaceports.

The first Trump administration galvanized significant and sustainable transformation of the U.S. space industry, including the reconstitution of the National Space Council, the creation of the U.S. Space Force, the formation of the Artemis Accords, and substantial regulatory reform aimed at the licensing of launch vehicles, Earth observation satellites, and next-generation broadband constellations, among others. On August 13, 2025, the second Trump administration released an ambitious Executive Order (EO), Enabling Competition in the Commercial Space Industry, to further build on the off-worldly successes of President Trump’s first term.

Recognizing that the ability of U.S. operators to “efficiently launch, conduct missions … and reenter United States airspace” is critical to the U.S. economy, its national security, and the success of the U.S. Government in accomplishing its own space objectives, the EO formally adopts a policy to “enhance American greatness in space.” To achieve this objective, the EO directs streamlining and reform efforts in four key areas—commercial launch and reentry, spaceport infrastructure, novel space activities, and regulatory leadership and accountability—to foster competition among launch providers and facilitate a substantial increase in launch cadence and the deployment of novel space activities by the target date of 2030. Continue reading →

Published on:

By and

Following the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision affirming the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) authority to administer the Universal Service Fund (USF or Fund), a bipartisan, bicameral group of members of Congress are taking tangible steps towards potential USF reform.  In an effort to evaluate and propose potential reforms to the USF with the goal of developing a forum to guide education, awareness, and policymaking, the Congressional USF working group is currently seeking public input on how best to re-shape the Fund going forward to ensure the long-term effectiveness of each USF program.

Earlier this month, Senator Deb Fischer (R-NE) announced the launch of the USF working group’s public comment portal.  Interested parties, whether individuals or organizations, have an opportunity to provide initial responses to help guide Congress as it reviews the structure, priorities, and implementation strategy of the Fund.  The questionnaire directs respondents to share their input on specific topics concerning the effectiveness of existing programs and considerations for reform, including: Continue reading →

Published on:

By and

On Thursday, August 7, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC” or “Commission”) held its monthly Open Meeting, where it considered items spanning several industries, including broadcasting, satellite communications, and public safety, among others.  The expansive agenda reflected the Commission’s full court press on agency-wide regulatory streamlining, system modernization, and expansion of nationwide connectivity initiatives.  Below are high-level summaries of the items the Commission considered and adopted as part of the August meeting:

NEPA Review Modernization

The Commission adopted a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to re-examine its environmental review procedures in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) as amended in 2023, and to ensure such procedures are clear, facilitate greater and faster infrastructure deployment, and accelerate the federal permitting process.  To advance these objectives, the NPRM seeks comment on whether and how to revise the FCC’s rules to align with the updated definition of a “major federal action,” update or replace the Commission’s longstanding categorical exclusions, and streamline review timelines for environmental assessments and impact statements.  The NPRM further inquires whether geographic-area licenses and other Commission actions should trigger NEPA obligations and seeks comment on  proposed changes to related rules under the National Historic Preservation Act.

  • Comments on the NPRM are due by September 18, 2025; Reply Comments are due by October 3, 2025.

Streamlining Space Bureau Reviews

The Commission adopted a Second Report and Order (Order) in its Expediting Initial Processing of Satellite and Earth Station Applications proceeding, which focuses on further expediting processing of applications and removing certain regulatory barriers to modifying systems following authorization.  The Order facilitates the expansion of ground station as a service (GSaaS) by allowing operators to apply for baseline earth station licenses without pre-identified satellite points of communication and by streamlining the process by which operators can add or remove satellite points of communication to an existing earth station authorization.  Significantly, the Order also expands the types of modifications that will not require prior FCC approval, giving more post-authorization flexibility to space and earth station operators.  The Order also eliminates the paper copy retention rule, aligns renewal timelines across earth stations, geostationary, and non-geostationary satellite applications, adds a 30-day shot clock for certain renewals, and permits market access grantees to request special temporary access.

  • Except for those rules subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act, the Order will become effective on September 26, 2025.

Continue reading →

Published on:

By and

Earlier this year, FCC Chairman Brendan Carr initiated a sweeping initiative to review “every rule, regulation, or guidance document” that could be eliminated “for the purposes of alleviating unnecessary regulatory burdens.”  At its July Open Meeting, the Commission voted 2-1 to adopt a Direct Final Rule framework to enable it to act expeditiously in the In re: Delete, Delete, Delete proceeding to repeal certain legacy regulations that have become “outdated, obsolete, unlawful, anticompetitive, or otherwise no longer in the public interest.”  The principal feature of the Direct Final Rule approach is to permit the elimination of rules without the notice and comment procedures typically required under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).  The FCC’s lone Democrat, Commissioner Anna Gomez, dissented, expressing concern that the Direct Final Rule process circumvents essential transparency and due process safeguards, sidestepping a mechanism for public involvement.

At the highest level, the APA establishes the framework by which federal agencies like the FCC propose, adopt, modify, and revoke regulations, thereby ensuring transparency and public participation in the process.  In adopting the Direct Final Rule, the FCC explained that there is “good cause” under the APA to forgo this notice and comment process where it is “unnecessary,” such as where the administrative rules to be modified or eliminated are insignificant or inconsequential to the public.  In its recent efforts, the FCC deleted 11 rule provisions comprising 39 regulatory “burdens” it said related to obsolete technology, outdated marketplace conditions, expired deadlines, or repealed legal obligations, and which therefore no longer serve the public interest. Continue reading →

Published on:

By and

Schools, hospitals, and libraries in poor and rural areas and millions of low-income American consumers can breathe a sigh of relief: they will continue to receive uninterrupted service subsidies through the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) Universal Service Fund (USF or Fund). On June 27, 2025, the US Supreme Court issued a significant decision in FCC v. Consumers’ Research affirming the constitutionality of Congress’s delegation of authority to the FCC to administer the USF, thereby upholding the funding mechanism used to deliver subsidized phone, broadband, and telecommunications service to millions of American consumers and community institutions. By a 6-3 vote, the Court reversed a ruling by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals that held both Congress’s delegation of USF authority to the FCC and the FCC’s subsequent delegation of its authority to a private administrator violated the Constitution (read our article on the Fifth Circuit’s July 2024 decision here). The decision also resolved a split in the circuit courts, as the Sixth and Eleventh Circuit Courts of Appeal had decided in favor of the FCC in similar proceedings.

At issue in the case was the application of the “nondelegation doctrine,” a principle of constitutional law that says Congress cannot delegate legislative authority to any other branch of government or to a private entity. Specifically, Consumers’ Research challenged whether the discretionary power granted to the FCC to set and collect the “Contribution Factor”—the mandatory contribution assessed against the interstate end-user revenues of each telecommunication carrier on a quarterly basis—to fund a government initiative amounts to an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority (“public” delegation). Consumers’ Research also asserted that the FCC then committed a further unconstitutional delegation of authority when it conferred its congressionally delegated authority to administer the USF to a private entity, the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) to permanently administer the Fund by calculating contribution rates, collecting contributions, and disbursing those contributions to subsidized projects (“private” delegation). USAC is subordinate to the FCC. Continue reading →